Antiepileptic combination therapy with Stevens‐Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: Analysis of a Japanese pharmacovigilance database

Abstract

Objective

Stevens‐Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are immune‐mediated diseases characterized by an extensive loss of the epidermal skin layer, often resulting in death. SJS and TEN are often triggered by certain drugs, including antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Epilepsy is very difficult to treat and often involves the combination of two or more AEDs. In this study, we quantified not only the risk of SJS or TEN associated with single‐AED therapy but also the risk related to concomitant AED treatment using reporting‐derived signals.

Methods

An analysis of the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database was performed from the first quarter of 2004 to the fourth quarter of 2018. The single‐AED signals were evaluated using the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), and the combination therapy signals were evaluated using Ω shrinkage measure and combination risk ratio (CRR).

Results

SJS signals were associated with 11 AEDs, and TEN signals were related to 12 AEDs. Moreover, the following AED combinations were associated with SJS signals: carbamazepine‐lorazepam (Ω
025: 0.33, CRR: 2.18) and fosphenytoin‐lorazepam (Ω
025: 0.99, CRR: 39.20). The TEN signals were related to the following combinations: clobazam‐gabapentin (Ω
025: 0.35, CRR: 3.14), phenytoin‐gabapentin (Ω
025: 0.03, CRR: 2.18), valproic acid–gabapentin (Ω
025: 0.15, CRR: 2.25), clobazam‐clonazepam (Ω
025: 0.03, CRR: 2.93), clobazam–valproic acid (Ω
025: 0.29, CRR: 1.55), fosphenytoin‐lamotrigine (Ω
025: 0.05, CRR: 7.37), and lacosamide‐levetiracetam (Ω
025: 0.74, CRR: 1.85).

Significance

This study identified two AED combinations that increased the SJS signals and seven combinations that increased the TEN signals. Although AED monotherapies require attention for SJS and TEN, some AED combinations require extra caution.

0